Windows Support Number

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

undo-redo-undo-redo...

Posted on 06:19 by Unknown
Code available on GitHub

I'm currently building a UI with a semi-complex input-form that requires the ability to 'undo, redo, undo, redo' user actions ad-infinitum. Not only does it require the ability to undo the text typed in text-boxes etc it needs the ability to undo (or redo) button clicks that add\remove complex properties (reference types).

For example imagine I have the following model, where there is a hierarchical structure to the data  - parent-child relationships, the Widget has one settable value type property - 'Name' & a collection of child Widgets accessed via the 'Children' property, this property can not set by the caller- the caller has to use the 'AddChild' & 'RemoveChild' methods to affect the enumerable 'Children' property. I want the ability to 'undo, redo, undo, redo' on these two properties.
public class Widget : Model
{
private int? id;
private Widget parent;
private string name;
private readonly ObservableCollection<Widget> children;

public Widget()
{
children = new ObservableCollection<Widget>();
}

public int? Id
{
get { return id; }
private set
{
SetPropertyAndNotify(ref id, value, () => Id);
}
}

public string Name
{
get { return name; }
set
{
SetPropertyAndNotify(ref name, value, () => Name);
}
}

public Widget Parent
{
get { return parent; }
private set
{
SetPropertyAndNotify(ref parent, value, () => Parent);
}
}

public IEnumerable<Widget> Children
{
get { return children; }
}

public Widget AddChild(Widget child)
{
if (children.Contains(child))
{
return this;
}

child.Parent = this;
children.Add(child);

return this;
}

public Widget AddChild(IEnumerable<Widget> childs)
{
foreach (var child in childs)
{
AddChild(child);
}

return this;
}

public Widget RemoveChild(Widget child)
{
if (!children.Contains(child))
{
return this;
}

child.Parent = null;
children.Remove(child);

return this;
}

public Widget RemoveAllChildren()
{
foreach (var child in children.ToList())
{
child.Parent = null;
children.Remove(child);
}

return this;
}
}
I know already the kind of functionality required, an implementation of the Command Pattern, specifically the Memento Pattern. A quick Google found some interesting implementations much of which I didn't like for a couple of reason, one being no separation from UI - here or to complex (to many interfaces) - here. A couple more examples were just to old, not using modern languages features like Lambda expressions. In fact the use of Lambdas should make this a trivial exercise. The solution I want should be capable of being used within an MVC implementation without being tied to it, in fact it should know nothing about either the Model or the View. I envisage it being used from inside the Controller. This fits well with the UI I'm currently building, an MVVM implementation.

The solution I came up with has 2 classes, the first is the Memento we wish to be able to 'undo-redo'. As you can see the use of Action delegate syntax to remove any explicit knowledge of how the 'undo-redo' steps will be performed. There are 2 constructors one for when both undo & redo is supported and the other when only undo is supported:
public class Memento
{
public Action Undo { get; private set; }
public Action Redo { get; private set; }

public Memento(Action undo)
{
Undo = undo;
Redo = () => { };
}

public Memento(Action undo, Action redo)
{
Undo = undo;
Redo = redo;
}
}
The second class actual contains the Memento instances, simply it contains a pair of Stack representing the undo & redo list. When an Undo action is executed the Memento is first popped from the undo stack, executed and then pushed onto the Redo stack, and it's the reverse for a Redo action. The only other behaviour of note is when a new Undo\Redo is added, any Redo's are cleared, this is to prevent confusion when changes are being reverted to a certain point and then editing continues.
public class Undoable
{
private readonly Stack<Memento> undoStack;
private readonly Stack<Memento> redoStack;

public Undoable()
{
undoStack = new Stack<Memento>();
redoStack = new Stack<Memento>();
}

public void Add(Action undoAction, Action redoAction)
{
undoStack.Push(new Memento(undoAction, redoAction));
redoStack.Clear();
}

public void Undo()
{
if (undoStack.Count == 0)
{
return;
}

var current
= undoStack.Pop();
current
.Undo();
redoStack
.Push(current);
}

public void Redo()
{
if (redoStack.Count == 0)
{
return;
}

var current
= redoStack.Pop();
current
.Redo();
undoStack
.Push(current);
}

public void Clear()
{
redoStack
.Clear();
undoStack
.Clear();
}
}
So to round a couple of test written using MSpec. The first one shows the Undo'ing of setting a simple (value type) property on the model:
[Subject("Undoable")]
public class when_undoing_a_value_type_property_modification
{
private Establish context = () =>
{
undoable = new Undoable();
widget = new Widget {Name = OriginalName};
};

private Because of = () =>
{
undoable.Add(() => { widget.Name = OriginalName; }, () => { widget.Name = NewName; });

widget.Name = NewName;
undoable.Undo();
};

private It should_undo_setting_the_name_on_a_widget = () => widget.Name.ShouldEqual(OriginalName);

private static string OriginalName = "Original Name - " + Guid.NewGuid();
private static string NewName = "New name - " + Guid.NewGuid();
private static Widget widget;
private static Undoable undoable;
}

The second shows the Redo'ing of adding a child Widget to the parent:
[Subject("Undoable")]
public class when_redoing_a_reference_type_property_modification
{
private Establish context = () =>
{
undoable = new Undoable();
parent = new Widget { Name = "Parent Widget" };
child = new Widget { Name = "Child Widget" };
};

private Because of = () =>
{
undoable.Add(() => parent.RemoveChild(child), () => parent.AddChild(child));
parent.AddChild(child);
undoable.Undo();
undoable.Redo();
};

private It parent_widget_should_cotain_child_widget = () => parent.Children.Contains(child).ShouldEqual(true);

private It parent_widget_children_collection_should_not_be_empty = () => parent.Children.Count().ShouldNotEqual(0);

private static Widget parent;
private static Widget child;
private static Undoable undoable;
}

I've pushed this to GitHub here.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in C#, Command, Design Patterns, Development | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Unit testing Rx methods Timeout & Retry with moq
    Earlier this week I was trying to unit test an asynchronous service (Foo) which used another asynchronous service (Bar) internally and ran i...
  • Understanding RefCount in Reactive Extensions
    A couple of weeks ago  @LordHanson  & I ran into an issue converting a stateless async service exposed as an Rx cold observable to a  co...
  • StructureMap: ILifecycle
    The other day I wanted to control the scope of a service inside a web based app with semantics which didn't fit either 'HttpContextS...
  • MVVM anti-pattern: Injecting the IoC container into a View Model
    This is another anti-pattern I've seen a lot recently, the dynamic use of the IoC container inside a view model to resolve child view mo...
  • How many pins can Bing Maps handle in a WP7 app - part 1
    part2 -  http://awkwardcoder.blogspot.com/2011/10/how-many-pins-can-bing-maps-handle-in.html part3 -  http://awkwardcoder.blogspot.com/2011/...
  • Bad developers love 'The Daily WTF'
    When 'The Daily WTF' started up back in 2003/2004 it was a great laugh looking at shocking code other developers wrote, but after a ...
  • Using CompositeDisposable in base classes
    To help make an object eligible for collection by the GC (garbage collector) one would implement the IDisposable interface. Executing the di...
  • Implementing a busy indicator using a visual overlay in MVVM
    This is a technique we use at work to lock the UI whilst some long running process is happening - preventing the user clicking on stuff whil...
  • Daily Dilbert Service - the most important service I've ever written...
    NuGet package available here ... First off a big shout to  @hamish  &  @leeoades  on this one - I'm just blogging about it. At work ...
  • Comparing performance of .Net 4.5 to .Net 4.0 for WPF
    Currently I'm working on a .Net 4.0 WPF app and we've had some discussion about moving to .Net 4.5, we don't get to make the dec...

Categories

  • .Net
  • .Net 4.5
  • Abstractions
  • Advertising
  • Agile
  • Agile Courage
  • AOP
  • Async
  • automated testing
  • Azure
  • Azure IIS RESTful development
  • BDD
  • Bing Maps
  • Bounded Context
  • C#
  • C# 5.0
  • Caching
  • Chocolatey
  • CLoud
  • CodePlex
  • Coding
  • Coding Building CI Testing
  • Coding C#
  • coding C# IoC StructureMap
  • Coding Functional-Programming
  • Coding REST Knowledge
  • Coding Services
  • Coding TDD Refactoring Agile
  • Command
  • continuous testing
  • coupling
  • CultureInfo
  • DAL
  • databases
  • DDD
  • DDD Coaching
  • DDD Domain Events Auditing nHibernate
  • DDD Entities Value Objects
  • Debugging
  • Design Patterns
  • Design Patterns Databases Auditing
  • Developement
  • Development
  • Development Coding
  • Development Process
  • Development unit testing
  • Development VS 2011
  • Diagnostics
  • Disposable
  • Exceptions
  • FINDaPAD
  • FindaPad Property Rental Windows Phone 7 Mobile Devices
  • Fun Coding Duct-Tape
  • Hotfixes
  • integration testing
  • IoC
  • jasmine
  • javascript
  • Jobs Development
  • LINQ
  • marketplace
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mocking
  • MSDN Coding
  • MSpec
  • Multilingual
  • MVC
  • MVVM
  • nCrunch
  • nHbiernate Repository Pattern Criteria
  • nHibernate Auditing Design Fluent
  • nHibnerate Entities Events Listeners
  • node.js
  • nodes.js
  • Nokia
  • NoSQL RavenDB Azure Development
  • Observations
  • OO
  • ORM
  • Performance
  • Portable Class Library
  • Portable Library
  • PostSharp
  • Process
  • Rants
  • RavenDB IIS 7.5 Development
  • Reactive
  • Reactive Extension
  • Reactive Extensions
  • ReadOnlyCollections
  • Resharper
  • REST Distributed-Systems
  • REST HTTP
  • rest web
  • RESTful
  • Rx
  • Serialization
  • Silverlight
  • Silverlight Installation
  • Task
  • TDD
  • TDD IoC DI
  • TDD Mocking
  • TDD Team Observation
  • Telerik
  • testing
  • threading
  • TPL
  • UI
  • Undo-Redo
  • unit testing
  • ViewModels
  • VS 2012
  • wcf
  • web api
  • Web Services
  • web services mobile devices data
  • WebAPI
  • Windows
  • Windows 8
  • windows phone
  • Windows Phone 7
  • WP7
  • WP7 Bing Maps Development Network HTTP
  • WP7 Bing Maps Development UK Crime
  • WP7 Bing Maps Development UK Crime Clustering
  • WP7 Bing Maps Development UK Polygons Clustering Performance
  • WP7 cryptography bouncy castle
  • WP7 Cultures C#
  • WP7 feedback development app store
  • WP7 Javascript web browser
  • WP7 MSBuild
  • WP7 ORM Databases performance
  • WP7 Serialisation
  • WP7 SilverlightSerializer C#
  • WP7 sqlite performance development
  • WP7 WP7Contrib Bing Maps Development
  • WP7 WP7Contrib Bing Maps Polygon Development
  • WP7 WP7Contrib CodePlex
  • WP7 WP7Contrib CodePlex Bing Maps Development
  • WP7 WP7Contrib CodePlex ObservableCollection
  • WP7 WP7Contrib ILMerge .Net
  • WP7 WP7Contrib Phone Maps
  • WP7 WP7Contrib SilverlightSerializer C#
  • WP7Contrib
  • WP7Contrib Bing Maps WP7
  • WP7Contrib WP7 Geo-Location development C#
  • WP7Contrib WP7 HTTP Compression
  • WP7Contrib WP7 Url Development Rx
  • WP7Dev
  • WPF
  • WPF Cultures
  • WuApi
  • XAML

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (16)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2012 (44)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ▼  February (4)
      • Playing around with undo & redo functionality on WP7
      • undo-redo-undo-redo...
      • Trying to test strongly typed datatables with sqli...
      • An ORM would have saved time...
  • ►  2011 (52)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2010 (1)
    • ►  August (1)
  • ►  2009 (32)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile